Atlas vs Mercury
Two recruitment CRMs compared on pricing, features, and fit, so you can shortlist with confidence.
✓Pricing verified against vendor pagesData reviewed July 4, 2026How we research →
By Ramin Assemi, B2B SaaS marketer and former Head of Content at Close.comPublished Updated
Atlas
AI-native "CRMx" that writes the record from your calls and email
Best for: Agency desks — perm, executive search and contract — that want capture and automation instead of CRM data entry
✓Automatic capture is the real differentiator: calls, email and meetings land on the record without anyone typing a note, with transcripts, summaries and actions attached to the right person and company (G2 reviewers, Mar–Aug 2026; vendor site, Sep 2026)
✓Reviewers who ran Bullhorn and Vincere before it single out support response times as the best they've used (G2, Jul 2026)
✕Contract billing, not pay & bill: GP, invoice and payment status are tracked and pushed to Xero, but that link runs one way, there is no payroll, and timesheet capture is not described anywhere Atlas publishes — a desk that pays contractors needs that machinery elsewhere (Atlas team, Sep 2026)
✕WhatsApp and contact enrichment are paid add-ons rather than part of the seat: about £7/user/mo and from £20/user/mo (Atlas team, Sep 2026)
Mercury
Recruitment platform built on Microsoft Dynamics 365
Best for: Enterprise agencies embedded in the Microsoft ecosystem
✓Unparalleled Microsoft integration (Teams, Outlook, Office 365)
✓Power Platform flexibility for custom automation
✕Complex interface requiring extensive training
✕High total cost: Mercury + Microsoft licensing + implementation
Our verdict
Choose Atlas if…
- ✓You're in executive search firms, a segment Mercury doesn't focus on
- ✓You're in contract & temp staffing, a segment Mercury doesn't focus on
- ✓AI matching and assistance are on your must-have list
- ✓You want to trial before committing (free trial available)
Choose Mercury if…
- ✓You're in rpo providers, a segment Atlas doesn't focus on
- ✓Multi-job-board posting is core to how you fill roles
Feature-by-feature
| Feature | Atlas | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| ATS + CRM core | ✓ | ✓ |
| Email/inbox sync | ✓ | ✓ |
| LinkedIn / Chrome extension | ~ | ~ |
| Multi-job-board posting | ~ | ✓ |
| Built-in candidate sourcing | ~ | ~ |
| Workflow automation | ✓ | ✓ |
| AI matching & assistance | ✓ | ~ |
| Reporting & analytics | ✓ | ✓ |
| Temp back-office (pay & bill) | ~ | ~ |
| Open API | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile app | ~ | ~ |
IncludedPartial or paid add-onNot available
What would it cost your team?
| Est. monthly cost, entry tier | 5 seats | 20 seats | 50 seats |
|---|---|---|---|
| Atlas (official) | £125/user/mo (12-mo term)flat | £125/user/mo (12-mo term)flat | £125/user/mo (12-mo term)flat |
| Mercury (official) | Custom quote | Custom quote | Custom quote |
Estimated from each vendor's published entry-tier price as of July 4, 2026; real quotes vary with plan tier, add-on modules, and contract terms. See how we label pricing confidence.
Frequently asked questions
How do Atlas and Mercury pricing compare?
Atlas pricing starts at £125/user/mo (12-mo term) (official, reviewed July 4, 2026). Mercury uses custom quote-based pricing and does not publish list prices (official, reviewed July 4, 2026).
What does Atlas cost?
Atlas pricing starts at £125/user/mo (12-mo term) (official, reviewed July 4, 2026). £125/user/mo is Atlas's standard rate on its standard 12-month term, supplied by the vendor and also sold in USD, EUR and AUD; payment is monthly or annually in advance, and discounts apply for longer terms, upfront payment and volume. A no-commitment option exists at a higher rate. Two add-ons are licensed per seat and are not in the £125: Contact Enrichment from £20/user/mo and WhatsApp from about £7/user/mo (Atlas team, Sep 2026).
What does Mercury cost?
Mercury uses custom quote-based pricing and does not publish list prices (official, reviewed July 4, 2026). Custom quote only, no public seat pricing. Built on Microsoft Dynamics, so budget for Microsoft licensing plus Mercury's implementation, data migration, and training services (vendor site, Jul 2026).
Which is rated higher, Atlas or Mercury?
Atlas is rated higher: 4.9/5 on G2 versus 4.2/5 for Mercury on G2.
Who is Atlas best for, and who is Mercury best for?
Atlas: Agency desks — perm, executive search and contract — that want capture and automation instead of CRM data entry. Mercury: Enterprise agencies embedded in the Microsoft ecosystem.