recruitmentcrm.com

Firefish vs Loxo

Two recruitment CRMs compared on pricing, features, and fit, so you can shortlist with confidence.

✓Pricing verified against vendor pagesData reviewed September 22, 2026How we research →

By , B2B SaaS marketer and former Head of Content at Close.comPublished Updated

Firefish

Recruitment CRM with built-in marketing for UK agencies

4.4
£80/user/moReported

Best for: UK agencies that treat their website and brand as a candidate channel

✓Recruitment marketing (website CMS, campaigns, engagement tracking) built in

✓Outstanding UK-based support reputation

✕Rigid contract lengths reported by customers

✕Some job board integrations are paid extras

Loxo

Talent intelligence platform with an 850M+ profile sourcing database

4.6(168)
$149/user/mo (annual)Official

Best for: Search firms and sourcing-heavy teams that live on outbound

✓Loxo Source, an 850M+ profile talent graph on the Professional tier, can replace LinkedIn Recruiter licenses (vendor pricing page, Sep 2026)

✓Powerful omnichannel outreach (email, SMS, LinkedIn) plus AI notetaker

✕Customers report price increases at renewal with no published cap, and the $149 Core price is sold as a limited-time new-customer offer (vendor pricing page, Sep 2026)

✕Strict contact-data credit limits on lower tiers

Our verdict

Choose Firefish if…

  • ✓Multi-job-board posting is core to how you fill roles

Choose Loxo if…

  • ✓You're in executive search firms, a segment Firefish doesn't focus on
  • ✓You're in in-house talent acquisition, a segment Firefish doesn't focus on
  • ✓You want built-in candidate sourcing instead of separate tools
  • ✓AI matching and assistance are on your must-have list

Feature-by-feature

FeatureFirefishLoxo
ATS + CRM core✓✓
Email/inbox sync✓✓
LinkedIn / Chrome extension~✓
Multi-job-board posting✓~
Built-in candidate sourcing~✓
Workflow automation✓✓
AI matching & assistance~✓
Reporting & analytics✓✓
Temp back-office (pay & bill)~–
Open API~✓
Mobile app✓✓

IncludedPartial or paid add-onNot available

What would it cost your team?

Est. monthly cost, entry tier5 seats20 seats50 seats
Firefish (reported)£400/mo£1,600/mo£4,000/mo
Loxo (official)$149/user/mo (annual)flat$149/user/mo (annual)flat$149/user/mo (annual)flat

Estimated from each vendor's published entry-tier price as of September 22, 2026; real quotes vary with plan tier, add-on modules, and contract terms. See how we label pricing confidence.

Frequently asked questions

How do Firefish and Loxo pricing compare?

Firefish pricing starts at £80/user/mo (reported, reviewed September 22, 2026). Loxo pricing starts at $149/user/mo (annual) (official, reviewed September 22, 2026).

What does Firefish cost?

Firefish pricing starts at £80/user/mo (reported, reviewed September 22, 2026). Vendor site is quote-led: its pricing page names Basic, Professional and Enterprise plans without prices, plus add-on modules "from £150 per module" with no billing period stated (vendor pricing page, Sep 2026). Capterra reports Basic £80, Professional £90, Enterprise £105 per user/mo (Capterra, Oct 2025). Contract terms not verified; some job board integrations cost extra.

What does Loxo cost?

Loxo pricing starts at $149/user/mo (annual) (official, reviewed September 22, 2026). Annual plans only, paid up front; there is no monthly contract. Core, the entry tier, is $149/user/mo and Professional is $199/user/mo, both billed annually and both labelled a limited-time offer for new customers. Enterprise is a custom annual agreement. Professional includes 2,500 data credits per seat each month. Third-party sites still quote older $109 and $169 prices, which the vendor page supersedes. There is no free tier any more; the trial is 7 days on the Professional platform (vendor pricing page, Sep 2026).

Which is rated higher, Firefish or Loxo?

Loxo is rated higher: 4.6/5 on G2 versus 4.4/5 for Firefish on G2.

Who is Firefish best for, and who is Loxo best for?

Firefish: UK agencies that treat their website and brand as a candidate channel. Loxo: Search firms and sourcing-heavy teams that live on outbound.