Firefish vs Recruiterflow
Two recruitment CRMs compared on pricing, features, and fit, so you can shortlist with confidence.
✓Pricing verified against vendor pagesData reviewed July 4, 2026How we research →
By Ramin Assemi, B2B SaaS marketer and former Head of Content at Close.comPublished Updated
Firefish
Recruitment CRM with built-in marketing for UK agencies
Best for: UK agencies that treat their website and brand as a candidate channel
✓Recruitment marketing (website CMS, campaigns, engagement tracking) built in
✓Outstanding UK-based support reputation
✕Rigid contract lengths reported by customers
✕Some job board integrations are paid extras
Recruiterflow
Automation-first ATS/CRM with the AIRA agent suite
Best for: Modern boutique agencies that live on outbound and automation
✓Recipes automate across candidates, jobs, companies, and deals — not just candidate stage changes
✓Deep multichannel sequencing: 7 step types with conditional branching and native LinkedIn steps
✕Premium pricing, and the AI features that anchor the marketing sit on the quote-only AIRA plan
✕AI agents and contact lookups draw on a separately purchased credit wallet; bought credits expire after 12 months
Our verdict
Choose Firefish if…
UK agencies that treat their website and brand as a candidate channel. See the feature table below for where it differs from Recruiterflow.
Choose Recruiterflow if…
- ✓You're in executive search firms, a segment Firefish doesn't focus on
- ✓AI matching and assistance are on your must-have list
- ✓You need an open API for custom integrations
- ✓Your team sources through LinkedIn every day
Feature-by-feature
| Feature | Firefish | Recruiterflow |
|---|---|---|
| ATS + CRM core | ✓ | ✓ |
| Email/inbox sync | ✓ | ✓ |
| LinkedIn / Chrome extension | ~ | ✓ |
| Multi-job-board posting | ✓ | ✓ |
| Built-in candidate sourcing | ~ | ~ |
| Workflow automation | ✓ | ✓ |
| AI matching & assistance | ~ | ✓ |
| Reporting & analytics | ✓ | ✓ |
| Temp back-office (pay & bill) | ~ | – |
| Open API | ~ | ✓ |
| Mobile app | ✓ | ~ |
IncludedPartial or paid add-onNot available
What would it cost your team?
| Est. monthly cost, entry tier | 5 seats | 20 seats | 50 seats |
|---|---|---|---|
| Firefish (reported) | £400/mo | £1,600/mo | £4,000/mo |
| Recruiterflow (official) | $745/mo | $2,980/mo | $7,450/mo |
Estimated from each vendor's published entry-tier price as of July 4, 2026; real quotes vary with plan tier, add-on modules, and contract terms. See how we label pricing confidence.
Frequently asked questions
How do Firefish and Recruiterflow pricing compare?
Firefish pricing starts at £80/user/mo (reported, reviewed July 4, 2026). Recruiterflow pricing starts at $149/user/mo (official, reviewed July 4, 2026).
What does Firefish cost?
Firefish pricing starts at £80/user/mo (reported, reviewed July 4, 2026). Vendor site is quote-led; Capterra reports Basic £80, Professional £90, Enterprise £105 per user/mo (Capterra, Oct 2025). Contract terms not verified; some job board integrations cost extra.
What does Recruiterflow cost?
Recruiterflow pricing starts at $149/user/mo (official, reviewed July 4, 2026). Platform plan $149/user/mo billed monthly, $119/user/mo billed annually; the AIRA AI plan is quote-only with no published price. The pricing page states there are no feature add-ons, but the vendor's own help centre documents a separate metered AI-credits wallet bought on top of the seat price and spent on contact lookups and AI agents (2 credits per email or phone lookup), with purchased credits expiring 12 months after purchase. Self-serve migration is free; white-glove migration is paid by data volume (vendor pricing page and help centre, Aug 2026).
Which is rated higher, Firefish or Recruiterflow?
Recruiterflow is rated higher: 4.6/5 on G2 versus 4.4/5 for Firefish on G2.
Who is Firefish best for, and who is Recruiterflow best for?
Firefish: UK agencies that treat their website and brand as a candidate channel. Recruiterflow: Modern boutique agencies that live on outbound and automation.