Gem vs Greenhouse
Two recruitment CRMs compared on pricing, features, and fit, so you can shortlist with confidence.
✓Pricing verified against vendor pagesData reviewed September 22, 2026How we research →
By Ramin Assemi, B2B SaaS marketer and former Head of Content at Close.comPublished Updated
Gem
Sourcing-first talent platform with staffing-specific plans
Best for: Sourcing-led teams: in-house TA and outbound-heavy search firms
✓One-click sourcing across 30+ platforms with multi-channel sequencing
✓Best-in-class analytics and forecasting
✕Expensive at scale; enterprise deals run high per seat
✕Strict email-finding credit limits on lower tiers
Greenhouse
Structured hiring platform with built-in sourcing & CRM
Best for: Scaling mid-market and enterprise TA teams that want evaluation rigor
✓The reference implementation of structured hiring: scorecards, interview kits, consistent criteria
✓Vast integration marketplace
✕High administrative complexity; often needs a dedicated admin
✕Mandatory implementation packages reported by buyers
Our verdict
Choose Gem if…
- ✓You're in executive search firms, a segment Greenhouse doesn't focus on
- ✓You're in recruitment agencies & staffing firms, a segment Greenhouse doesn't focus on
- ✓You want built-in candidate sourcing instead of separate tools
- ✓Your team sources through LinkedIn every day
Choose Greenhouse if…
- ✓Multi-job-board posting is core to how you fill roles
Feature-by-feature
| Feature | Gem | Greenhouse |
|---|---|---|
| ATS + CRM core | ✓ | ✓ |
| Email/inbox sync | ✓ | ✓ |
| LinkedIn / Chrome extension | ✓ | ~ |
| Multi-job-board posting | ~ | ✓ |
| Built-in candidate sourcing | ✓ | ~ |
| Workflow automation | ✓ | ✓ |
| AI matching & assistance | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reporting & analytics | ✓ | ✓ |
| Temp back-office (pay & bill) | – | – |
| Open API | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile app | – | ~ |
IncludedPartial or paid add-onNot available
What would it cost your team?
| Est. monthly cost, entry tier | 5 seats | 20 seats | 50 seats |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gem (official) | $695/mo | $2,780/mo | $6,950/mo |
| Greenhouse (official) | Custom quote | Custom quote | Custom quote |
Estimated from each vendor's published entry-tier price as of September 22, 2026; real quotes vary with plan tier, add-on modules, and contract terms. See how we label pricing confidence.
Frequently asked questions
How do Gem and Greenhouse pricing compare?
Gem pricing starts at $139/user/mo (official, reviewed September 22, 2026). Greenhouse uses custom quote-based pricing and does not publish list prices (official, reviewed July 4, 2026).
What does Gem cost?
Gem pricing starts at $139/user/mo (official, reviewed September 22, 2026). Staffing plans on monthly billing: Essentials $139/user/mo (up to 3 users per account) and Professional $199/user/mo (up to 10 users). Billed yearly those drop to $99 and $149. Enterprise is custom, with the choice of Gem's ATS or a third-party one. Both paid staffing plans start with a 7-day trial. Email-finding credits are 150/user/mo on Essentials and 750 on Professional. Corporate plans are quoted on company headcount, with discounted startup pricing under 100 employees (vendor pricing pages, Sep 2026).
What does Greenhouse cost?
Greenhouse uses custom quote-based pricing and does not publish list prices (official, reviewed July 4, 2026). Custom quote only: Core, Plus, and Pro plans are demo-led with no public prices. Current packaging includes sourcing & CRM in Core, and reviewers report mandatory implementation fees on top (vendor pricing page, Jul 2026).
Which is rated higher, Gem or Greenhouse?
Gem is rated higher: 4.8/5 on G2 versus 4.3/5 for Greenhouse on G2.
Who is Gem best for, and who is Greenhouse best for?
Gem: Sourcing-led teams: in-house TA and outbound-heavy search firms. Greenhouse: Scaling mid-market and enterprise TA teams that want evaluation rigor.