Happlicant vs Loxo
Two recruitment CRMs compared on pricing, features, and fit, so you can shortlist with confidence.
✓Pricing verified against vendor pagesData reviewed July 4, 2026How we research →
By Ramin Assemi, B2B SaaS marketer and former Head of Content at Close.comPublished Updated
Happlicant
Lightweight, transparent ATS/CRM for solo recruiters
Best for: Solo recruiters and tiny teams who want zero bloat
✓Extreme ease of use with instant onboarding
✓Transparent pricing and no annual lock-in
✕Intentionally shallow: no invoicing or VMS integrations
✕No app marketplace or API
Loxo
Talent intelligence platform with a 1.2B-profile sourcing database
Best for: Search firms and sourcing-heavy teams that live on outbound
✓Loxo Source: 1.2B-profile database can replace LinkedIn Recruiter licenses
✓Powerful omnichannel outreach (email, SMS, LinkedIn) plus AI notetaker
✕Steep price escalation as teams grow; recent price increases
✕Strict contact-data credit limits on lower tiers
Our verdict
Choose Happlicant if…
Solo recruiters and tiny teams who want zero bloat. See the feature table below for where it differs from Loxo.
Choose Loxo if…
- ✓You're in executive search firms, a segment Happlicant doesn't focus on
- ✓You're in in-house talent acquisition, a segment Happlicant doesn't focus on
- ✓You want built-in candidate sourcing instead of separate tools
- ✓You want workflow automation working out of the box
Feature-by-feature
| Feature | Happlicant | Loxo |
|---|---|---|
| ATS + CRM core | ✓ | ✓ |
| Email/inbox sync | ~ | ✓ |
| LinkedIn / Chrome extension | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-job-board posting | ~ | ~ |
| Built-in candidate sourcing | ~ | ✓ |
| Workflow automation | ~ | ✓ |
| AI matching & assistance | – | ✓ |
| Reporting & analytics | ~ | ✓ |
| Temp back-office (pay & bill) | – | – |
| Open API | – | ✓ |
| Mobile app | – | ✓ |
IncludedPartial or paid add-onNot available
What would it cost your team?
| Est. monthly cost, entry tier | 5 seats | 20 seats | 50 seats |
|---|---|---|---|
| Happlicant (official) | $69/user/mo (quarterly)flat | $69/user/mo (quarterly)flat | $69/user/mo (quarterly)flat |
| Loxo (official) | $169/user/mo (annual)flat | $169/user/mo (annual)flat | $169/user/mo (annual)flat |
Estimated from each vendor's published entry-tier price as of July 4, 2026; real quotes vary with plan tier, add-on modules, and contract terms. See how we label pricing confidence.
Frequently asked questions
How do Happlicant and Loxo pricing compare?
Happlicant pricing starts at $69/user/mo (quarterly) (official, reviewed July 4, 2026). Loxo pricing starts at $169/user/mo (annual) (official, reviewed July 4, 2026).
What does Happlicant cost?
Happlicant pricing starts at $69/user/mo (quarterly) (official, reviewed July 4, 2026). Pro $69/user/mo billed quarterly; Enterprise is custom flat-fee with unlimited users. No annual lock-in; cancel anytime. Optional Leads Discovery add-on $49/user/mo (vendor pricing page, Jul 2026).
What does Loxo cost?
Loxo pricing starts at $169/user/mo (annual) (official, reviewed July 4, 2026). Basic at $169/user/mo on annual billing for new customers; Professional and Enterprise are quote-based. Note: third-party sites still show an older $109 price; the current official page supersedes it. Contact-data credits are metered separately (vendor pricing page, Jul 2026).
Which is rated higher, Happlicant or Loxo?
Happlicant is rated higher: 4.9/5 on G2 versus 4.6/5 for Loxo on G2.
Who is Happlicant best for, and who is Loxo best for?
Happlicant: Solo recruiters and tiny teams who want zero bloat. Loxo: Search firms and sourcing-heavy teams that live on outbound.