Greenhouse vs Pin
Two recruitment CRMs compared on pricing, features, and fit, so you can shortlist with confidence.
✓Pricing verified against vendor pagesData reviewed July 4, 2026How we research →
By Ramin Assemi, B2B SaaS marketer and former Head of Content at Close.comPublished Updated
Greenhouse
Structured hiring platform with built-in sourcing & CRM
Best for: Scaling mid-market and enterprise TA teams that want evaluation rigor
✓The reference implementation of structured hiring: scorecards, interview kits, consistent criteria
✓Vast integration marketplace
✕High administrative complexity; often needs a dedicated admin
✕Mandatory implementation packages reported by buyers
Pin
AI sourcing and outreach layer with an 850M-profile database
Best for: Sourcing-led boutiques that need response rates, not a system of record
✓850M+ profile database with AI matching
✓Outreach algorithms producing standout reply rates (~17% on LinkedIn)
✕A sourcing layer, not a complete system of record
✕Usually needs a separate ATS for post-interview pipeline
Our verdict
Choose Greenhouse if…
- ✓You're in in-house talent acquisition, a segment Pin doesn't focus on
- ✓You need an open API for custom integrations
- ✓Multi-job-board posting is core to how you fill roles
- ✓Reporting and analytics drive how you run the desk
Choose Pin if…
- ✓You're in recruitment agencies & staffing firms, a segment Greenhouse doesn't focus on
- ✓You're in executive search firms, a segment Greenhouse doesn't focus on
- ✓You want built-in candidate sourcing instead of separate tools
- ✓Your team sources through LinkedIn every day
Feature-by-feature
| Feature | Greenhouse | Pin |
|---|---|---|
| ATS + CRM core | ✓ | ~ |
| Email/inbox sync | ✓ | ✓ |
| LinkedIn / Chrome extension | ~ | ✓ |
| Multi-job-board posting | ✓ | – |
| Built-in candidate sourcing | ~ | ✓ |
| Workflow automation | ✓ | ✓ |
| AI matching & assistance | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reporting & analytics | ✓ | ~ |
| Temp back-office (pay & bill) | – | – |
| Open API | ✓ | ~ |
| Mobile app | ~ | – |
What would it cost your team?
| Est. monthly cost, entry tier | 5 seats | 20 seats | 50 seats |
|---|---|---|---|
| Greenhouse (official) | Custom quote | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Pin (official) | $99/mo (Solo, annual)flat | $99/mo (Solo, annual)flat | $99/mo (Solo, annual)flat |
Estimated from each vendor's published entry-tier price as of July 4, 2026; real quotes vary with plan tier, add-on modules, and contract terms. See how we label pricing confidence.
Frequently asked questions
How do Greenhouse and Pin pricing compare?
Greenhouse uses custom quote-based pricing and does not publish list prices (official, reviewed July 4, 2026). Pin pricing starts at $99/mo (Solo, annual) (official, reviewed July 4, 2026).
What does Greenhouse cost?
Greenhouse uses custom quote-based pricing and does not publish list prices (official, reviewed July 4, 2026). Custom quote only: Core, Plus, and Pro plans are demo-led with no public prices. Current packaging includes sourcing & CRM in Core, and reviewers report mandatory implementation fees on top (vendor pricing page, Jul 2026).
What does Pin cost?
Pin pricing starts at $99/mo (Solo, annual) (official, reviewed July 4, 2026). Solo $99/mo (annual billing only), Professional $149/user/mo annual ($179 monthly), Business $249/user/mo annual ($299 monthly). SSO/SAML and SCIM are +$150/mo each (vendor pricing page, Jul 2026).
Which is rated higher, Greenhouse or Pin?
Pin is rated higher: 4.8/5 on G2 versus 4.3/5 for Greenhouse.
Who is Greenhouse best for, and who is Pin best for?
Greenhouse: Scaling mid-market and enterprise TA teams that want evaluation rigor. Pin: Sourcing-led boutiques that need response rates, not a system of record.