Mercury vs Pin
Two recruitment CRMs compared on pricing, features, and fit, so you can shortlist with confidence.
✓Pricing verified against vendor pagesData reviewed July 4, 2026How we research →
By Ramin Assemi, B2B SaaS marketer and former Head of Content at Close.comPublished Updated
Mercury
Recruitment platform built on Microsoft Dynamics 365
Best for: Enterprise agencies embedded in the Microsoft ecosystem
✓Unparalleled Microsoft integration (Teams, Outlook, Office 365)
✓Power Platform flexibility for custom automation
✕Complex interface requiring extensive training
✕High total cost: Mercury + Microsoft licensing + implementation
Pin
AI sourcing and outreach layer with an 850M-profile database
Best for: Sourcing-led boutiques that need response rates, not a system of record
✓850M+ profile database with AI matching
✓Outreach algorithms producing standout reply rates (~17% on LinkedIn)
✕A sourcing layer, not a complete system of record
✕Usually needs a separate ATS for post-interview pipeline
Our verdict
Choose Mercury if…
- ✓You're in rpo providers, a segment Pin doesn't focus on
- ✓You need an open API for custom integrations
- ✓Multi-job-board posting is core to how you fill roles
- ✓Reporting and analytics drive how you run the desk
Choose Pin if…
- ✓You're in executive search firms, a segment Mercury doesn't focus on
- ✓You want built-in candidate sourcing instead of separate tools
- ✓AI matching and assistance are on your must-have list
- ✓Your team sources through LinkedIn every day
Feature-by-feature
| Feature | Mercury | Pin |
|---|---|---|
| ATS + CRM core | ✓ | ~ |
| Email/inbox sync | ✓ | ✓ |
| LinkedIn / Chrome extension | ~ | ✓ |
| Multi-job-board posting | ✓ | – |
| Built-in candidate sourcing | ~ | ✓ |
| Workflow automation | ✓ | ✓ |
| AI matching & assistance | ~ | ✓ |
| Reporting & analytics | ✓ | ~ |
| Temp back-office (pay & bill) | ~ | – |
| Open API | ✓ | ~ |
| Mobile app | ~ | – |
What would it cost your team?
| Est. monthly cost, entry tier | 5 seats | 20 seats | 50 seats |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury (official) | Custom quote | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Pin (official) | $99/mo (Solo, annual)flat | $99/mo (Solo, annual)flat | $99/mo (Solo, annual)flat |
Estimated from each vendor's published entry-tier price as of July 4, 2026; real quotes vary with plan tier, add-on modules, and contract terms. See how we label pricing confidence.
Frequently asked questions
How do Mercury and Pin pricing compare?
Mercury uses custom quote-based pricing and does not publish list prices (official, reviewed July 4, 2026). Pin pricing starts at $99/mo (Solo, annual) (official, reviewed July 4, 2026).
What does Mercury cost?
Mercury uses custom quote-based pricing and does not publish list prices (official, reviewed July 4, 2026). Custom quote only, no public seat pricing. Built on Microsoft Dynamics, so budget for Microsoft licensing plus Mercury's implementation, data migration, and training services (vendor site, Jul 2026).
What does Pin cost?
Pin pricing starts at $99/mo (Solo, annual) (official, reviewed July 4, 2026). Solo $99/mo (annual billing only), Professional $149/user/mo annual ($179 monthly), Business $249/user/mo annual ($299 monthly). SSO/SAML and SCIM are +$150/mo each (vendor pricing page, Jul 2026).
Which is rated higher, Mercury or Pin?
Pin is rated higher: 4.8/5 on G2 versus 4.2/5 for Mercury.
Who is Mercury best for, and who is Pin best for?
Mercury: Enterprise agencies embedded in the Microsoft ecosystem. Pin: Sourcing-led boutiques that need response rates, not a system of record.